pshhht!
whats the point of having you and some other chicks love baby?? thats all the guilt with none of the pleasure, thats like saying, "yo, i want you to go to prison for the next 30 years while i go kill someone" like, wheres the fun in that?
by the way, feminism is about as relevant today as the betamax being superior quality than vhs. and i surely don't see the application in something like theory....i think its just plain old rebelliousness that pushes women to complain about their role in hunter gatherer world. so the concept of babysitters was around at that time? where exactly would the women find time between having babies and maintaining the cave?
i mean, where men soley responsible for the rise of civilisation? of course not. men and women have needed and always will need each other to play their pivotal roles. like in any household, things developed as a cooperative effort. women do deserve credit for their part, but to get all silly and argue about the roles of the hunter and gatherer is like men complaining about their image as being tesoterone fueled pigs fucking or killing everything in their sights.
i agree that all sexes should be dealt with equally, but the differences between the sexes are distinct and its silly to pretend it doesnt exhist, the way most feminists do. i think feminism is about as good as chauvanism. they are both extremist perspectives that do more harm than good.
Thanks for your comment. And hey, nice journal entry. I'm going to have to start upping the intellectual level of mine, I didn't realize the standard had been set so high.
Your comments on post hoc feminist additions to prehistory are very interesting. Do you feel like personal biases often get incorporated into scientific theory, and tend to blind researchers from looking as objectively as they can at facts? As a biologist, I see this too (though from a different perspective,) people who are in one 'scientific camp' tend to only interpret new data as it supports their own theory - or immediately discount data that contradicts their own. Do you believe it's possible to ever be truly objective?
whats the point of having you and some other chicks love baby?? thats all the guilt with none of the pleasure, thats like saying, "yo, i want you to go to prison for the next 30 years while i go kill someone" like, wheres the fun in that?
by the way, feminism is about as relevant today as the betamax being superior quality than vhs. and i surely don't see the application in something like theory....i think its just plain old rebelliousness that pushes women to complain about their role in hunter gatherer world. so the concept of babysitters was around at that time? where exactly would the women find time between having babies and maintaining the cave?
i mean, where men soley responsible for the rise of civilisation? of course not. men and women have needed and always will need each other to play their pivotal roles. like in any household, things developed as a cooperative effort. women do deserve credit for their part, but to get all silly and argue about the roles of the hunter and gatherer is like men complaining about their image as being tesoterone fueled pigs fucking or killing everything in their sights.
i agree that all sexes should be dealt with equally, but the differences between the sexes are distinct and its silly to pretend it doesnt exhist, the way most feminists do. i think feminism is about as good as chauvanism. they are both extremist perspectives that do more harm than good.
and yes, theory is sexy as fuck.
Your comments on post hoc feminist additions to prehistory are very interesting. Do you feel like personal biases often get incorporated into scientific theory, and tend to blind researchers from looking as objectively as they can at facts? As a biologist, I see this too (though from a different perspective,) people who are in one 'scientific camp' tend to only interpret new data as it supports their own theory - or immediately discount data that contradicts their own. Do you believe it's possible to ever be truly objective?