Hmmm. I wonder if anyone here is familiar with trivia about the remake of Dawn of the Dead. Which was sweet, by the way. I'm definitely getting the unrated version when it comes out.
I finally picked up a copy of Zombi 2. The 25th anniversary edition DVD is pretty well done. Anyway, watching that made me think that the scenes in the end credits of DotD -- with the boat, especially the rotting food that they found on it, and the arrival at the island -- might be a nod to Fulci's flick.
Anyone know if that's the case?
As I side note, I'd like to thank my old correspondents at DMG for turning me on to Italian zombi films. This one was a classic.
I finally picked up a copy of Zombi 2. The 25th anniversary edition DVD is pretty well done. Anyway, watching that made me think that the scenes in the end credits of DotD -- with the boat, especially the rotting food that they found on it, and the arrival at the island -- might be a nod to Fulci's flick.
Anyone know if that's the case?
As I side note, I'd like to thank my old correspondents at DMG for turning me on to Italian zombi films. This one was a classic.
Good point in that thread about proving the existence of God. I'm still not sure about the fence sitting issue though. Does logic demand skepticism? I don't really know. If so, then the default state should be disbelief until proven otherwise. I know it's not necessarily a valid analogy,but I doubt many people say "Well, I haven't seen conclusive evidence for it, so until I do I'll just say I'm undecided as to the existence of the tooth fairy." The problem with all of these discussions is that any logical analysis of an ontological proof is bound to end up in a tautology. Which would invalidate the proof in the first place - except for the caveat that you brought up, that ontological proofs have as their foundation that logic need not apply. I think that's why I have such a hard time wrapping my head around them. Anyway, good fodder for discussion.