digitaladdiction

I have no thing near a boyfriend.
The non-date things are actual non-dates, not cutesy covers for dates.
Projection dreams? You'll have to explain them to me, I don't think I know much about them. That means I won't give an opinion yet!

Oh yeh? I'm lucky because I got to play with Rich from Commute, hey? I feel you. He's pretty damn talented.

thanks for the comment. sometimes i feel all foolish for typing up scattered thoughts for public consumption, but a good response makes it all worthwhile.

I expected some corn, ya know... I mean they had 3 different movie monsters in one movie... That's got crap written all over it. Why no Mummy? Just get everybody involved. It was sooooo made for teenagers.... like most movies nowadays.

They did actually have gunpowder then. The Eiffel Tower was going up. I forget what year that was built, but it was Victorian times. They had dynamite and guns and cannons. But... still the technology was a bit far-fetched. All the high voltage was a bit over-the-top. But then, it WAS sci-fi. What bothered me was that a woman of that era that was liberated enough to wear pants wouldn't wear a corset and heels. "I can't breathe or run, but I have free leg movement!" And the photos in the movie looked modern. They had the colour right, but the quality and setting were totally off. I can take the outlandish sci-fi stuff if they get the little details right, but they didn't try on any of it. But... most teenagers won't recognize that stuff. I would've, but I was a geek... still am. Like, The Time Machine. They got all the little stuff right, so the time machine concept was more believable. I detest bad movies. And a movie set in Victorian times has to be REALLY BAD before I will hate it.

that would be sooo cool !

Thanks for the comment.... I'm not always a jerk, I swear.