Okay. I'm an idiot for not realizing mike_blacklisted was who he is, and he is a musical fairy (or wizard) of knowledge so everyone should go to his MP3 downloading site in his profile.
I decided to buy more bourbons and I am currently sipping this:
Now I know what you're thinking: 1) Is that moonshine?? 2) Is that a jar?? 3) it must be cheap and foul, and 4) why is a Kentucky bourbon producer naming themself for Georgia? The answers are: 1) No, it's bourbon, but it's clear, not brown... or at the very least, it appears to be bourbon, since booze companies don't list their ingredients, 2) Yes... yes, it is a jar with a big, screw-on lid. Yes, I am sipping from it; what am I gonna do, pour it into a snifter? 3) it is actually kinda nice in an unusual corn way. It definitely tastes like a food product from corn, but it is sweet without being too sweet. I kinda dig it. Also, it is almost $12 per jar. Not as cheap as some! 4) I have no idea... maybe because Georgia is more south than Kentucky? It's kinda foolish, though.
I also got this but won't drink it tonight, obviously:
Elmer T. Lee's Bourbon.
I am going to extremely ignore the City Paper saying that Broken Flowers isn't very good. They were wrong about Me and You and Everyone We Know and dead wrong about Wet Hot American Summer. I can appreciate negative reviews, but I swear to god it seems like they hate everything except the occasional action movie while bagging on most action movies and everything else.
I read around the review a bit (I usually look at the ends and intros to reviews to get a general rating and to avoid giving away lots of the story, which reviews usually do in the middle 3/5 of the review) and the guy was all "I can't tell whether Jarmusch is parodying these people or he likes them," which shows you how smallminded most reviewers are- they don't get that you can like and dislike things at the same time, duuuhhhh. Take your parents; I bet you like some things about them, and dislike other things. Take the city you live in. Take you favorite albums; probably like some tracks, not so much others. It's called LIFE, dimwad reviewer. Some positives, some negatives. A good director has characters and things with both, cuz it's like REAL life. I remember an interview with Redd Kross in 1987. They lamented that "everything has to be this laugh-riot like the Beastie Boys or all serious like U2." I've probably quoted this here before cuz lames and squares always have this problem with things that criticize and pay tribute, or have sarcasm, or have both silliness and sadness. Squares never get this message- things have more than one side... or they'd be one-dimensional.
I decided to buy more bourbons and I am currently sipping this:
Now I know what you're thinking: 1) Is that moonshine?? 2) Is that a jar?? 3) it must be cheap and foul, and 4) why is a Kentucky bourbon producer naming themself for Georgia? The answers are: 1) No, it's bourbon, but it's clear, not brown... or at the very least, it appears to be bourbon, since booze companies don't list their ingredients, 2) Yes... yes, it is a jar with a big, screw-on lid. Yes, I am sipping from it; what am I gonna do, pour it into a snifter? 3) it is actually kinda nice in an unusual corn way. It definitely tastes like a food product from corn, but it is sweet without being too sweet. I kinda dig it. Also, it is almost $12 per jar. Not as cheap as some! 4) I have no idea... maybe because Georgia is more south than Kentucky? It's kinda foolish, though.
I also got this but won't drink it tonight, obviously:
Elmer T. Lee's Bourbon.
I am going to extremely ignore the City Paper saying that Broken Flowers isn't very good. They were wrong about Me and You and Everyone We Know and dead wrong about Wet Hot American Summer. I can appreciate negative reviews, but I swear to god it seems like they hate everything except the occasional action movie while bagging on most action movies and everything else.
I read around the review a bit (I usually look at the ends and intros to reviews to get a general rating and to avoid giving away lots of the story, which reviews usually do in the middle 3/5 of the review) and the guy was all "I can't tell whether Jarmusch is parodying these people or he likes them," which shows you how smallminded most reviewers are- they don't get that you can like and dislike things at the same time, duuuhhhh. Take your parents; I bet you like some things about them, and dislike other things. Take the city you live in. Take you favorite albums; probably like some tracks, not so much others. It's called LIFE, dimwad reviewer. Some positives, some negatives. A good director has characters and things with both, cuz it's like REAL life. I remember an interview with Redd Kross in 1987. They lamented that "everything has to be this laugh-riot like the Beastie Boys or all serious like U2." I've probably quoted this here before cuz lames and squares always have this problem with things that criticize and pay tribute, or have sarcasm, or have both silliness and sadness. Squares never get this message- things have more than one side... or they'd be one-dimensional.
VIEW 14 of 14 COMMENTS
zanafar:
Jar, bottle, can, its all the same to me.....dont touch any of it 
nocontrol:
Next weekend would be better for me.