VIEW 4 of 4 COMMENTS
More Blogs
-
14
Friday Mar 31, 2006
making quiche today. with meat. meat quiche with a side of meat, some… -
2
Wednesday Mar 29, 2006
rapidly losing interest in the whole internet profile phenomenon. -
0
-
7
Wednesday Mar 22, 2006
Read More -
5
Sunday Mar 19, 2006
well, dear friends, it has failed yet again: i made it exactly one we… -
6
Monday Mar 06, 2006
Read More -
2
Thursday Mar 02, 2006
welcome to the motherfucking terrordome, georgie. can anyone say impe… -
3
Friday Feb 24, 2006
well, since my radical picture of Richard Pryor has disappeared i gue… -
68
Sunday Dec 11, 2005
Read More -
4
Friday Dec 09, 2005
well, that didn't take long. i'm such a chump... missed you guys
Secondly - I like Mill and Nietzsche for very different reasons. Nietzsche didn't have an ideology as such - but in a sense that was his ideology. "Hitherto, every great philosophy has been a confession on the part of its author." - that there is no universal truth and that our views, morality and prejudice are all signs of where we came from and our experiences etc. He valued original thought and longed for there to be more great thinkers who would challenge the status quo. You can't be a Nietzschean if you agree with Nietzsche - as all great pupils must reject their teacher in the end. Mill, on the other hand is more of a guide for a morality that fits in with Nietzsche's ideas - that there is no universals - with Mill, you make decisions on how to act based on very subjective means. Your intentiona are always to do the best by the most with added factors including your own sense of priority.