CONSPIRACIES
Conspiracies occur. Human history is literally one conspiracy after another. How have people become convinced that conspiracies stopped happening? Sure, they'll accept that duplicity occurred in the seats of power during the colonial era and Europe's late monarchies, or in the middle ages and papacy, or in imperial Rome, or in antiquity, etc...
But I really want to know why people think that their era is free of such things?
Well, that is not entirely true. They'll accept the notion of Muslims conspiring against them, but never that people in seats of power in their own culture could ever do such a thing.
It is though private banking is to be treated with reverence and infallibility. They mustn't ever be questioned - hell, they mustn't even be identified for the most part or treated like they have any power, influence, or motives in the political process. It is though think tanks, study groups, international orders and organizations, etc... shouldn't be mentioned as influential, or if they are, they must be mentioned glowingly.
We are constantly told "conspiracies can't happen on a large scale without participants revealing them."
Well, guess what? THEY DO REVEAL THEM. They hide them in plain view.
Their confessions and future plans are in white papers, industry magazines, scholarly documents, policy novels, and think tank reports. But you don't read any of those things, do you? Your media doesn't mention them. They don't circulate widely outside of intellectual circles. Keep in mind that you can acquire these books on Amazon, or in Foreign Affairs magazine, or in Trilateral Commission minutes and releases, you can read World Bank, WTO, and IMF documents online, you can go to CIA.gov and read after action reports, ANYONE CAN DO IT.
But you don't read do you? Sure if you are one of the incredible minority who reads anything at all, you'll read horseshit like Harry Potter, the local sports page, the celebrity gossip column, fashion magazines, or some other drivel - but you don't read Bryzezinski, Rockefeller's Memoirs, huge tomes by Carrol Quigley, or things like Limits to Growth and NSSM 200.
Beyond that, you have been systematically trained, generally through preening pseudo-intellectual peer pressure, to guffaw at anyone who mentions the CFR, the Federal Reserve, Bilderberg group, Henry Kissenger, James Wolfensohn,"New World Order," Rockefellers, Richard N. Haass, Trilateral Commission, the Rothschild family, etc... or any other buzzword that makes you post bullshit like this :
or this:
When I see things like that, I realize that most of you are too chickenshit to ever look into anything that isn't spoonfed to you. These people exist. These organizations exist. They will freely admit to their aims - it is an end of sovereign States, fully replaced with private fiat lending institutions directing resources, dividing up the spoils of the earth, while codifying planetwide feudalism through intermediary regional bureaucracies. <--------- Not me saying it - ***THEM*** saying it - publishing books and issuing reports about it.
They call this visionary system a "New World Order." They call our current system and all others previous - the old order.
...And they have trained you to laugh at the term "New World Order" and claim that it doesn't exist. Unless you agree with it, and then you are trained to believe that yes a New World Order does/should exist and is/would be good.
You know everything I've posted here over the years is true. Are you going to continue to be a coward and not research the claims?
Because frankly, I've lost my drive and feel like at this point it is pearls before swine on this website.
Conspiracies occur. Human history is literally one conspiracy after another. How have people become convinced that conspiracies stopped happening? Sure, they'll accept that duplicity occurred in the seats of power during the colonial era and Europe's late monarchies, or in the middle ages and papacy, or in imperial Rome, or in antiquity, etc...
But I really want to know why people think that their era is free of such things?
Well, that is not entirely true. They'll accept the notion of Muslims conspiring against them, but never that people in seats of power in their own culture could ever do such a thing.
It is though private banking is to be treated with reverence and infallibility. They mustn't ever be questioned - hell, they mustn't even be identified for the most part or treated like they have any power, influence, or motives in the political process. It is though think tanks, study groups, international orders and organizations, etc... shouldn't be mentioned as influential, or if they are, they must be mentioned glowingly.
We are constantly told "conspiracies can't happen on a large scale without participants revealing them."
Well, guess what? THEY DO REVEAL THEM. They hide them in plain view.
Their confessions and future plans are in white papers, industry magazines, scholarly documents, policy novels, and think tank reports. But you don't read any of those things, do you? Your media doesn't mention them. They don't circulate widely outside of intellectual circles. Keep in mind that you can acquire these books on Amazon, or in Foreign Affairs magazine, or in Trilateral Commission minutes and releases, you can read World Bank, WTO, and IMF documents online, you can go to CIA.gov and read after action reports, ANYONE CAN DO IT.
But you don't read do you? Sure if you are one of the incredible minority who reads anything at all, you'll read horseshit like Harry Potter, the local sports page, the celebrity gossip column, fashion magazines, or some other drivel - but you don't read Bryzezinski, Rockefeller's Memoirs, huge tomes by Carrol Quigley, or things like Limits to Growth and NSSM 200.
Beyond that, you have been systematically trained, generally through preening pseudo-intellectual peer pressure, to guffaw at anyone who mentions the CFR, the Federal Reserve, Bilderberg group, Henry Kissenger, James Wolfensohn,"New World Order," Rockefellers, Richard N. Haass, Trilateral Commission, the Rothschild family, etc... or any other buzzword that makes you post bullshit like this :
or this:
When I see things like that, I realize that most of you are too chickenshit to ever look into anything that isn't spoonfed to you. These people exist. These organizations exist. They will freely admit to their aims - it is an end of sovereign States, fully replaced with private fiat lending institutions directing resources, dividing up the spoils of the earth, while codifying planetwide feudalism through intermediary regional bureaucracies. <--------- Not me saying it - ***THEM*** saying it - publishing books and issuing reports about it.
They call this visionary system a "New World Order." They call our current system and all others previous - the old order.
...And they have trained you to laugh at the term "New World Order" and claim that it doesn't exist. Unless you agree with it, and then you are trained to believe that yes a New World Order does/should exist and is/would be good.
You know everything I've posted here over the years is true. Are you going to continue to be a coward and not research the claims?
Because frankly, I've lost my drive and feel like at this point it is pearls before swine on this website.
VIEW 3 of 3 COMMENTS
Have you read any of these? can you send me your abridged notes? I just don't gotta lotta time.