shiva8

yknow what... i hate to bitch but... i don't understand Marlowe's set. i have nothing against her...she's cute as a button, but come on! were they smoking crack when they accepted it?? it isn't Marlowe's fault the person who took the photos is a total amateur when it comes to focus yadda yadda...
i wouldn't think much about the whole thing if it weren't for the fact that the staff has talked so much about how sets have to be super high quality with creative themes to get accepted. i do realize that there is a huge backlog of girls waiting to go up -- staff said we'd be seeing much higher quality come summer and i would say that has been about 50/50 with the summer nearly over... probably more sets to go up than they realized... but, christ, what were they thinking to begin with?? why did they accept all of these low quality sets at the end of last year or whenever it was? were they just overwhelmed by the response and before they knew it they had given a resounding "yes" to a good share of the applicants? i know that there are a lot of members who are afraid to voice opinions on here for fear of getting zotted...but i don't think i'm in the minority here. i am a bit of a coward in that i am choosing to complain only in my journal -- i've seen how other members who voice legit concerns get shot down in certain groups and on the boards. i think the staff are adults and can handle criticism...unfortunately alot of others on this site cannot so i'm keeping my opinions somewhat to myself. sorry if i've offended any of you. don't think less of me.