I can't speak for everybody, but I can voice my opinions. I'm a little...okay, more than a little..more like a lot disappointed in the direction that SG is headed.
I've always been a huge fan of them being the modern pin-up site, an expression of beauty and defining women from an alternative viewpoint. It was refreshing to see photos of nude women, that weren't trashy or otherwise...
I hate to say it, but it seems like more and more girls (especially a LOT of the hopefuls..) are churning out more and more sets of more than implied nudity. I keep seeing more and more explicit vag shots than anything else. Eh. So what. Now SG is becoming "just another pornographic site"...nothing that separates it from Hustler or blahse blah.
I miss seeing gals like Bettina and there are some others who still hold the initial value of SG true. I love it when I see sets that express the woman...not focusing solely on vag shots. Then it really bothers me, when I see people commenting on GOOD sets, "You didn't get naked fast enough! I want to see boobs/ass/vag right away!"
That bothers me. Doesn't anyone remember the initial concept of SG? Doesn't anyone appreciate showing just enough to keep people interested? You can show nudity, implied or full, without spreading eagle or drawing near the line of beauty vs. porn. shmeh.
i hope it's just a phase or a current trend that fades out quickly.
EDITED TO ADD: Straight off the SG main page, and I quote:
"We are an army of 1,789 unconventionally gorgeous pin-up girls devoted to changing your idea of what makes women beautiful"
inconventional. pin ups. conventional would be...playboy, hustler, and whatnot. grr.
I've always been a huge fan of them being the modern pin-up site, an expression of beauty and defining women from an alternative viewpoint. It was refreshing to see photos of nude women, that weren't trashy or otherwise...
I hate to say it, but it seems like more and more girls (especially a LOT of the hopefuls..) are churning out more and more sets of more than implied nudity. I keep seeing more and more explicit vag shots than anything else. Eh. So what. Now SG is becoming "just another pornographic site"...nothing that separates it from Hustler or blahse blah.
I miss seeing gals like Bettina and there are some others who still hold the initial value of SG true. I love it when I see sets that express the woman...not focusing solely on vag shots. Then it really bothers me, when I see people commenting on GOOD sets, "You didn't get naked fast enough! I want to see boobs/ass/vag right away!"
That bothers me. Doesn't anyone remember the initial concept of SG? Doesn't anyone appreciate showing just enough to keep people interested? You can show nudity, implied or full, without spreading eagle or drawing near the line of beauty vs. porn. shmeh.
i hope it's just a phase or a current trend that fades out quickly.
EDITED TO ADD: Straight off the SG main page, and I quote:
"We are an army of 1,789 unconventionally gorgeous pin-up girls devoted to changing your idea of what makes women beautiful"
inconventional. pin ups. conventional would be...playboy, hustler, and whatnot. grr.
VIEW 7 of 7 COMMENTS
seva:
porn can be beautiful...just saying, that a lot of what's being churned out, is not in line with SG motto nor origins. meh. i guess people don't care. pussy is pussy right? *sarcasm*
mistydawn:
I definetly agree with you. the sets just aren't as interesting when it goes straight to vajayjay. they definetly don't keep me entertained. 