I cant imagine being called a feminist, but I do like feeling like Im the alpha whatever in any relationship. But then again, who doesnt. Maybe, I take it a step too far sometimes though. I've this idiosyncrasy that causes me to be absolutely fascinated with a guy shopping for groceries and doing his own laundry. Partly because Im female and would naturally pay attention to little domestic details, but also because its just fascinating.
I grew up with all these funny perceptions of how women should be subjugated to men and I can say my moms no help, with her funny ideas that go along the lines of Oh my god, theyve had sex. Good on her that shes made him marry her now. And then one day I realize that that was all bullshit, and felt the need to remedy the years lost living in that disillusion.
Ive always wondered why society (not so much now, as in the past) constantly subjugated women to that sort of sexual submission that constrained them from what men did all the time. I.e, fucking around. If you think about it, it makes no sense. If more women were less restrained by stupid, unstated societal standards, then a lot more would be fucking around, which is good for them, as well as the men. (I leave the definition of fucking around to your own moral digression. Pertaining to myself, it's definition would be sex that is good for your body and good for your soul. Which might also be akin to making love *shrugs* You decide.)
The whole idea that sluts will never inspire genuine love leading to matrimonial edicts can obviously be held only by misanthropes clearly against a more libertine society. The view that a girl with an illustrious sexual history will never wed, (aside from being bullshit, given that illustrious is not akin to matching up to Annabelle Chong) is also an obvious show of misogyny and inherent sexual insecurity.
Only notawomen (men who absolutely feel the need to proclaim that they are men by constantly doing things to prove that they arent women. Like being obsessed with destruction and constantly feeling the need to go to war) can be capable of such falsity, and I dont blame them. After all, the institution of marriage is the last instance to the validation that they are the superior sex in a world where women can just as easily treat men as trophies (I do not believe in treating people as prizes, by the way, this is just to make a point.); and even this is being denied to them as the purpose of marriage switches from the protection and support of females, from a time when they were denied the rights to a good career (no prizes why I think they were denied that, and by whom) to becoming a tribute to an equal love shared between two people of comparable independence.
I grew up with all these funny perceptions of how women should be subjugated to men and I can say my moms no help, with her funny ideas that go along the lines of Oh my god, theyve had sex. Good on her that shes made him marry her now. And then one day I realize that that was all bullshit, and felt the need to remedy the years lost living in that disillusion.
Ive always wondered why society (not so much now, as in the past) constantly subjugated women to that sort of sexual submission that constrained them from what men did all the time. I.e, fucking around. If you think about it, it makes no sense. If more women were less restrained by stupid, unstated societal standards, then a lot more would be fucking around, which is good for them, as well as the men. (I leave the definition of fucking around to your own moral digression. Pertaining to myself, it's definition would be sex that is good for your body and good for your soul. Which might also be akin to making love *shrugs* You decide.)
The whole idea that sluts will never inspire genuine love leading to matrimonial edicts can obviously be held only by misanthropes clearly against a more libertine society. The view that a girl with an illustrious sexual history will never wed, (aside from being bullshit, given that illustrious is not akin to matching up to Annabelle Chong) is also an obvious show of misogyny and inherent sexual insecurity.
Only notawomen (men who absolutely feel the need to proclaim that they are men by constantly doing things to prove that they arent women. Like being obsessed with destruction and constantly feeling the need to go to war) can be capable of such falsity, and I dont blame them. After all, the institution of marriage is the last instance to the validation that they are the superior sex in a world where women can just as easily treat men as trophies (I do not believe in treating people as prizes, by the way, this is just to make a point.); and even this is being denied to them as the purpose of marriage switches from the protection and support of females, from a time when they were denied the rights to a good career (no prizes why I think they were denied that, and by whom) to becoming a tribute to an equal love shared between two people of comparable independence.
VIEW 6 of 6 COMMENTS
i think men and women are truly becoming equals here although it is still a mans country and i say that knowing how biggoted it sounds but it is kindof true. i agree sex can be good for your body and good for your soul but it can be abused and used for the wrong reasons. i am definatly guilty of this in the past. i have however been sex free for over a year for those reasons. i think monogamy will be even more fulfilling...that is if i can ever find the right woman. but bassically the point i want to make is that i think you are a very wise girl and you are going to make somebody verry lucky someday. just let him know who wears the pants.
oh and i do all my shopping and laundry my son does help me choose things to buy at the store though.
sigh...you are totally the perfect woman. although dating you might make me want to go back to school so i know what the hell you are talking about sometimes (ok ok just kidding. but you are impressivly intelligent.)