Creator Finally Admits Design Flaws
December 8, 2005
After what seemed like an eternity, God has finally broken the silence on what has long been regarded by many as a series of mistakes in the design of Human 2.0. "Human 1.0 was really a crude implementation of all that had been envisioned." God was quoted as saying. Adding, "With version 2.0 we were going for a more feature-rich application built on the bare-bones (actually just one) of version 1.0" Although we couldn't get any specifics in the interview, apparently many years of exhaustive live-scenario testing has confirmed numerous feature functionality conflicts when operating in a network environment, or as a stand-alone system. One Human 1.0 user, frustrated by his efforts to interface with a version 2.0 with whom he has been linked these 20-odd years commented, "You can't just cram that many features into this thing and not expect there to be problems and logic errors." An angry version 2.0 upon hearing these remarks, retorted that the real problem lies version 1.0. She also made comparisons to swine "just like all [version 1.0 systems] are! He doesn't know his [input device] from his [output device]!" As of press time, there are still no plans to implement a new version, but alleged fixes and patches are numerous with no one yet providing a workable solution.
December 8, 2005
After what seemed like an eternity, God has finally broken the silence on what has long been regarded by many as a series of mistakes in the design of Human 2.0. "Human 1.0 was really a crude implementation of all that had been envisioned." God was quoted as saying. Adding, "With version 2.0 we were going for a more feature-rich application built on the bare-bones (actually just one) of version 1.0" Although we couldn't get any specifics in the interview, apparently many years of exhaustive live-scenario testing has confirmed numerous feature functionality conflicts when operating in a network environment, or as a stand-alone system. One Human 1.0 user, frustrated by his efforts to interface with a version 2.0 with whom he has been linked these 20-odd years commented, "You can't just cram that many features into this thing and not expect there to be problems and logic errors." An angry version 2.0 upon hearing these remarks, retorted that the real problem lies version 1.0. She also made comparisons to swine "just like all [version 1.0 systems] are! He doesn't know his [input device] from his [output device]!" As of press time, there are still no plans to implement a new version, but alleged fixes and patches are numerous with no one yet providing a workable solution.
I like your work and i would like to see more some time.