Login
Forgot Password?

OR

Login with Google Login with Twitter Login with Facebook
  • Join
  • Profiles
  • Groups
  • SuicideGirls
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Shop
Vital Stats

persya

Member Since 2004

Followers 913 Following 547

  • Everything
  • Photos
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Groups
  • From Others

Wednesday Jan 16, 2008

Jan 16, 2008
0
  • Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Email
photography lens question

I shoot with a Canon Rebel XT
I like lowlight photography...no flash...no tripod
so i was recommended the 85mm f/ 1.8

but then I noticed the 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS (Image Stabilizer)

I'm not really good with all of these technical terms for the lenses...i don't really understand the difference between the 2 apart from IS..

is the IS worth the extra money? does it work well? or should I just go with the 85mm f/ 1.8?

can anyone help?

(I did post this in the photography group as well, but no one has replied yet)
VIEW 5 of 5 COMMENTS
anaphalaxis:
Ok, your F stops are basically the size of the lens aperture (the hole through which your camera takes in light). The smaller the number (F 1.8, F2) the larger the hole, and thus the more light you get to the film or digital sensor. For low light photography you want as large an aperture as possible, which means smallest number. That's why you've been recomended the f 1.8 lens.
IS is not really neccessary for what you want. At F4.5 (the maximum size apeture on the IS lens), you're still going to have slower shutter speeds than the 85mm at F1.8 (and so blurrier pictures). It doesn't stop the image from bluring if people are moving, just helps prevent camera shake (your hand moving slightly while the shutter is open). If they did an F1.8 lens with IS and you had the money to spend I'd say go for it, but the F4.5 IS lens really isn't suitable for what you want.

I'd recomend you find a decent canon lens with F1.4. You'll be taking better pictures in lower light conditions than both of the above, and I think it'll still be cheaper than the IS lens. I don't know what the maximum ISO setting is for a Rebel XT but I'm sure you'd be fine in most night time indoor locations at about 1600 ISO with an F1.4, particularly if you're not printing your pictures and so can take very big pictures and reduce them in size.

Hope that helps a bit wink
Jan 16, 2008
rxqueen:
i responded to this on myspace! i'd repost it here for you but it looks like its already been covered smile
Jan 16, 2008

More Blogs

  • 11.08.11
    4

    Tuesday Nov 08, 2011

    this account is ending very soon. 7 years is a long time. met a lot o…
  • 08.21.11
    6

    Sunday Aug 21, 2011

    so after over 7 years on this site, I have decided to cancel my accou…
  • 08.07.10
    2

    Saturday Aug 07, 2010

    so i tried emailing a mobile photo blog here and it hasn't worked yet…
  • 02.28.10
    3

    Sunday Feb 28, 2010

    damn, I have a lot of naked ladies to catch up on!!
  • 02.22.09
    18

    Sunday Feb 22, 2009

    so I left out an important bit of information in my last blog I forgo…
  • 01.13.09
    20

    Tuesday Jan 13, 2009

    Read More
  • 01.04.09
    11

    Sunday Jan 04, 2009

    tatertot was the only one on here to wish me a happy birthday! exclud…
  • 12.28.08
    2

    Sunday Dec 28, 2008

    Read More
  • 12.25.08
    6

    Thursday Dec 25, 2008

    Read More
  • 12.11.08
    18

    Thursday Dec 11, 2008

    Read More

We at SuicideGirls have been celebrating alternative pin-up girls for:

24
years
3
months
6
days
  • 5,509,826 fans
  • 41,393 fans
  • 10,327,617 followers
  • 4,625 SuicideGirls
  • 1,113,818 followers
  • 15,021,038 photos
  • 321,315 followers
  • 61,626,188 comments
  • Join
  • Profiles
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Shop
  • Help
  • About
  • Press
  • LIVE

Legal/Tos | DMCA | Privacy Policy | 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement | Complaint / Content Removal Policy | Contact Us | Vendo Payment Support
©SuicideGirls 2001-2025

Press enter to search
Fast Hi-res

Click here to join & see it all...

Crop your photo