-twist kiss rend squeeze grind bones and soft pink flesh-
-small wrinkles of perfect panting sex ripple your lips wrapped around nipple and words of promise-
-all around you such gripping giving all of me the inside of me it's all you all yours where you begin we'll never end-
-staring stars unblinking pressure never sleeps and i'm writhing under streams of time lapse dreams-
-you shine you mean it all everything i try to cope too enourmous too vital this taste of you-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.
---Nietzsche
A casual flip of the wrist through the channels of cable television or FM radio will show you that majority rule isn't always humanity putting its best foot forward.
----Me
---------------------------------------------
is love fundamentally selfish? if it is, does that make it
ethically immoral, depending on the accepted (see above) definition of love? is love moral, immoral, or amoral? are there types of love? are all, if any, selfish, or can loves pick and choose what they want to be, like Halloween costumes? is it okay to love Halloween and Jeebus too? is unselfish love naivete or simply pure, like honey? do we call people we love honey because honey is one of the only incorruptable natural foods we consume outside of that which we bombard with radiation and earth-killing chemicals? do you love? do ewes love? do androids dream of electric sheep? would androids love us, love being us, or simply love killing us? all three, or are they all mutually exclusive? is love rational? do you love being us? did you do something today for you to love about us or for us to love about you?
love is love. it sort of holds things together. like gravity. or is it string(theory)?
------------------------------------------------------
t
10 days...
-small wrinkles of perfect panting sex ripple your lips wrapped around nipple and words of promise-
-all around you such gripping giving all of me the inside of me it's all you all yours where you begin we'll never end-
-staring stars unblinking pressure never sleeps and i'm writhing under streams of time lapse dreams-
-you shine you mean it all everything i try to cope too enourmous too vital this taste of you-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.
---Nietzsche
A casual flip of the wrist through the channels of cable television or FM radio will show you that majority rule isn't always humanity putting its best foot forward.
----Me
---------------------------------------------
is love fundamentally selfish? if it is, does that make it
ethically immoral, depending on the accepted (see above) definition of love? is love moral, immoral, or amoral? are there types of love? are all, if any, selfish, or can loves pick and choose what they want to be, like Halloween costumes? is it okay to love Halloween and Jeebus too? is unselfish love naivete or simply pure, like honey? do we call people we love honey because honey is one of the only incorruptable natural foods we consume outside of that which we bombard with radiation and earth-killing chemicals? do you love? do ewes love? do androids dream of electric sheep? would androids love us, love being us, or simply love killing us? all three, or are they all mutually exclusive? is love rational? do you love being us? did you do something today for you to love about us or for us to love about you?
love is love. it sort of holds things together. like gravity. or is it string(theory)?
------------------------------------------------------
t
10 days...
VIEW 11 of 11 COMMENTS
I can't "get a room" without causing a mad scandal, but I sure hope you enjoy yours.
And ah, romantic (not to be confused with Romantic era) love...is fictional. Clever, but not real. See, we came up with the idea when the church got big, started accusing man of being Lustful. romantic love was our response, spinning that general love that the religion was proclaiming into a justification for sexual action. And lust? That was the interpretation religious fools slapped onto what we now recognize as a basic, evolutionary physiological drive operating the way it should.
love on that upper level, the humanitarian consideration for life, is essentially moral, and thus arguably rational. Narrowing that love (thus narrowing the parameters that set the moral standard) cannot be moral. (questions of moral relativism can pop in now; I'll leave that alone) that "love" is also not rational on any level other than evolutionary (in which case it's not conscious rationality at work). The procreative drive is its own morality/rationality, and that's all you're left with.
That's my thinking, anyway.
Maybe if I was in love, I wouldn't think it was fictional...