For Reals Broseph! It's thee 2nd SGScotlandish meet tonight(you see that play on words back there? Epic!) Anyways it's going to be a night of drunken revelries and such.
I've been really bored the past two days and have been reading a crap ton of ""Conservapedia" and it is somewhat sickening to read how deluded some people are. Here are some quotes.
On the Iraq War
Here's the problem - we're here to state our bias, not to pretend that we're referring to ethereal, disconnected "facts" that are actually used only to bolster a... Read More
when I worked at an abortion clinic, I read every word of the propaganda the protesters provided. (how do you like my alliteration there?) I really wanted to understand both sides. I knew that we were biased. I know that the pro-abortion, pro-choice, pro-life, anti-choice spectrum doesn't make sense to people who think it's not possible to be both pro-life and pro-choice. I worry sometimes that it is a bit of a lie.
but it is not such a blatant lie as the pictures of the mangled babies. I've seen post-abortion product of conception, and it does not look like the pictures on the posters.
I know there are plenty of over-zealous liberals, but I wish everybody who is involved in the fear mongering would just chill out. I wish we could respect one another enough to accept that, even when our opinions and beliefs differ, both perspectives can be valid and well thought out.
people talk about how calling Obama by his middle name isn't offensive because, of course, it is his middle name, and how he is associated with a terrorist (which, to a lot of americans, means suicide bombers) without mentioning that the terrorist organization promotes education for immigrants.
why tell these half truths? why not just decide if we want a president whose top priorities include financial support for our soldiers and reducing the hemorrhaging of government money or the one whose top priorities include a reasonable removal from a country at civil war and responsible government spending. why not decide which administration we would prefer appoint as many as four supreme court justices-- justices we feel would make good law for this country? why vote against the guy who might maybe put the scary person in a position of power?
my life was a lot less complicated not knowing about this language that I know must learn.
because languages are teh sex.
anyway, no one ever argued that the bush girls weren't hot. mccain's going on his daughter, wife, and vice president's vaginas, and they only clean up partially well.
