Let's talk about porn...
Seriously.
The reason I am bringing up this topic is because as I was sitting here finishing up my work for the week, I'm watching Nightline, and they were doing a segment about the porn industry and how its now suddenly suffering due to the internet (huh?) and pirating (that I could see). At the recent Adult Industry Con in Vegas, they released a gimmick to draw people back to the world of buying porn... HD 3D porn!
First off, does the world really want HD porn? Stretch marks, scars from boob jobs gone wrong, razor burn... good times. I personally don't really care for "porn star" porn. Half those girls don't even look real. I realize that the "fantasy" is what appeals to the masses, but being the voyeur I am, the bad scripts, overly made up girls with their plastic parts... just don't do it for me. I like something, well, I guess I fall into the "platypus" category.
And since we're talking boobies, I would like to address something that I've read on the site many o' times. SG is not porn. And I really think that anyone who considers it porn, needs to... well, watch more porn. Yes, there are many beautiful girls on this site that bare it all, and the gambit runs from softly lit coy silhouettes to in your face spread shots, but in my humble opinion, it's not porn unless there is something going into the orifice of choice. You need sex to equal porn.
So what are your thoughts on this subject (and I know you have one)?
Seriously.
The reason I am bringing up this topic is because as I was sitting here finishing up my work for the week, I'm watching Nightline, and they were doing a segment about the porn industry and how its now suddenly suffering due to the internet (huh?) and pirating (that I could see). At the recent Adult Industry Con in Vegas, they released a gimmick to draw people back to the world of buying porn... HD 3D porn!
First off, does the world really want HD porn? Stretch marks, scars from boob jobs gone wrong, razor burn... good times. I personally don't really care for "porn star" porn. Half those girls don't even look real. I realize that the "fantasy" is what appeals to the masses, but being the voyeur I am, the bad scripts, overly made up girls with their plastic parts... just don't do it for me. I like something, well, I guess I fall into the "platypus" category.
And since we're talking boobies, I would like to address something that I've read on the site many o' times. SG is not porn. And I really think that anyone who considers it porn, needs to... well, watch more porn. Yes, there are many beautiful girls on this site that bare it all, and the gambit runs from softly lit coy silhouettes to in your face spread shots, but in my humble opinion, it's not porn unless there is something going into the orifice of choice. You need sex to equal porn.
So what are your thoughts on this subject (and I know you have one)?
I think its soft core porn, I've heard play boy called that, so I think SG may be in that category, but some may just consider it erotica, but some one once said "the only difference between erotica and porn is the lighting", I kind of go in between on this topic.