leighgabriel

@cheshire_ Nope, that would be Learning to Fly, which is still an awesome song :-) Learn to Fly is Foo Fighters and the story behind how I discovered that song is both funny and also a little scary. I first heard it on the radio back in 1999 and knew I had to have it, so I bought it on CD (How old am I? LOL). I listened to the single basically non-stop, including when I had a severe case of Montezuma's Revenge, suffice to say, there were many mad dashes to the old Porcelain Throne between plays.

Listen to music with your ears?  Philistine. 😬

Why is everyone saying "AI"? It's not. AI is a self-determining (sentient) computer program, an individual identity. What you're all calling AI is properly called Advanced Intelligence programming, which is decidedly not a self-determining individual. For 30 years, manipulating photos has been referred to as Photoshopping. Similarly, manipulating audio is Mixing or Remixing, which is what you are all talking about in this case. Elvis Presley's 2002 A Little More Conversation is a Remix by Junkie XL (Tom Holkenborg). And the Beatles' Now And Then is a Remix too, nothing more. The problem is, McCartney, like all of you, think an advanced computer program is AI. Whereas, MAL (Machine-Assisted Learning), the program he refers to, is still just an advanced computer program. "AI" is just the current buzzword. We're still a long way from achieving the reality. Grr! etc 😄 Just enjoy the music, folks ❤️

I’ve listened to The Beatles latest remasters intently, and caught most of the news stories and personal interviews of the surviving studio production members. They admit Sir George Martin was an absolute wizard at developing new recording techniques on the fly, especially when the original masters were mixed… stuff like putting the microphone in front of a playback speaker already tweaked to enhance the multi-voiceover style so prevalent with the early Fab 4. I’m reading he also would occasionally let his fingers drag the tapes in later sessions to enhance the psychedelics. These tweaks were very aptly carried over into the 2009 box set which I love tremendously, and which also produced the first stereo versions of older masters - perfectly done and a trick in itself worthy of Houdini. But in these latest ones it’s sometimes bland, off key, and I struggle to wrap myself around each Beatle’s voice. They often sound like wedding band imitators. Then I see stuff like Jeff Lynne and Dani Harrison may have dubbed over the stuff that couldn’t be recreated from Martin’s old masters. And after several more listens I must say I hear Lynne  more than I hear Lennon. Not hating per se, just befuddled over quasi sacred rock and pop music getting chewed up then presented as an authentic remaster just for shits giggles and greed.

👍💓💓

Very well said :D

From l-r: 24 year old model MJ (Abigail Cowen), 35 year old Mary Jane Parker (Emma Stone), 21 year old model MJ (Sadie Sink), 42 year old Mary Jane Parker (Bryce Dallas Howard), 16 year old student MJ (Sadie Sink). Bit of trivia for ya too, both Emma Stone and Bryce Dallas Howard played different versions of Peter's first love (And real love, if you ask most people) Gwen Stacy.

👍👍

Did someone say they wanted more @alenagzhel? Well aren't you the lucky one eh? Slightly different style to this one, with the gradient usage, I'd like to think it worked out reasonably well :-P I saw her photoset https://www.suicidegirls.com/girls/alenagzhel/album/4636576/innocence/ and fell in love with it, particularly image 2 which shows her cleavage in all it's glory. There is nothing quite like the tease of boobies, in my honest opinion. Evidently, I didn't get to use that image in this artwork, but I did get two really cute bumshots LOL. The photoset in question was shot by the very talented @ridmovies. Hope you all like it and obviously, I really hope the beautiful young lady likes it, too :-)

@ravenivy There may be surprises around the corner :-) ;-)