So I logged on today and started running through the latest hopeful sets in member review... And I think I have stumbled upon a trend.
As of late- the majority of the hopeful sets in review are bordering on a gynocological exam! I am completly all for showing your stuff and flaunting the holy shit out of it, but really? That much? This site celebrates women's beauty, don't get me wrong- and lady bits, while a tad odd looking in appearence are a beautiful thing- is it absolutly nesscessary to show EVERYTHING?? Let us face facts, when it comes to below the belt shots- as of late- those are a perspective best left to the minds of our lady bit doctors.
Honeslty, showing that much of one's parts isn't going to make you pink any faster. Personally, as a photographer that's worked with two girls on here and one guy in SB, I get a little giggly and awkward and tend to shy away from those Penthouse worthy views of someone's anatomy. Those pictures aren't really a necessity to a photoset- SG or hopeful. Tasteful lady bit shots, yes. Butt and backside of biscuit shots, great but not always needed.
It might just be me here in this line of thinking, but are these pictures a tell tale sign of yet another way this site is morphing into another variation of itself? Like say a shade more of dirty then tasteful beauty?
As of late- the majority of the hopeful sets in review are bordering on a gynocological exam! I am completly all for showing your stuff and flaunting the holy shit out of it, but really? That much? This site celebrates women's beauty, don't get me wrong- and lady bits, while a tad odd looking in appearence are a beautiful thing- is it absolutly nesscessary to show EVERYTHING?? Let us face facts, when it comes to below the belt shots- as of late- those are a perspective best left to the minds of our lady bit doctors.
Honeslty, showing that much of one's parts isn't going to make you pink any faster. Personally, as a photographer that's worked with two girls on here and one guy in SB, I get a little giggly and awkward and tend to shy away from those Penthouse worthy views of someone's anatomy. Those pictures aren't really a necessity to a photoset- SG or hopeful. Tasteful lady bit shots, yes. Butt and backside of biscuit shots, great but not always needed.
It might just be me here in this line of thinking, but are these pictures a tell tale sign of yet another way this site is morphing into another variation of itself? Like say a shade more of dirty then tasteful beauty?
VIEW 5 of 5 COMMENTS
remi:
Look at Arabella, I don't believe shes shown any vag in her SG sets that have gone live and shes had like 3 I believe. Proof you don't have to show.
kirin:
Orka's set is doing awesome!!!!! 