I'm in election mode so I bought a red sweatband as well as some adidas, a Muji jumper and some VO5 "mist" for my emerging fro.
Should stay in this evening and read 'Only Six Numbers' - it's going to be by a mathematician, and yo, in light of what the Harvard sausage was saying a week or two ago, by a man at that. Last night after watching Shawn of the Dead I drew a map of the universe, Medieval style with the Earth at the centre with "Label" in orbit on the right hand side of the planet and "Obey" to the left. I was trying to establish, in my own mind, how the principles of science, which exorcises legitimate "labelling", (of particles and processes) should be or should not be allowed into various functional aspects of our lives, such as as consumers - through formula distribution of clothing - entertainment, wages and services.
I am sure that humans are indirectly proportionate to atoms.
After re-publishing my language theory in my blog I have seen to revise it. What larks. I've put it into an equation to help me focus. All of my equations will hitherto remain secret so don't ask.
There was a second "phase" missing from my basic premise, which was "every time you use a word it has a different meaning."
The second phase, coming fractionally later in time to what I have temporarily dubbed the "word cause equation", is the event phase during which the word is used, read or heard in the real world outside of a place which must be like Platos World of the Forms: the user's "action" joined with the actuality of the word which is metaphysical until used. Any non-linguistic communication is part of this second phase, or the event phase.
Therefore using a word equates to: the wce + LIFE/nature/God. LIFE/nature/God consists entirely of nihilism, goodness (matter), light (here representing the metaphysical. Eg. love and metaphor), and Energy.
As life is fundamentally uncontrollable, so too then are words in action. However, the nature of languages encompasses finite aspects as well as time. One of these aspects is knowledge and another would be the proximal range of concepts or items to which a word might be adhered. Time, although unknowable and so, as thus, cannot be of mathematically infinite dimensions, is relevant to language because time provides a frame of semantics that is coupled with spatial location. This means that I need another formula, so I'll share mine with you though I'd previously...
tx (Infinity x u + U) x (W) = Infinity
In conclusion
# There are two phases of a words life each time that it is used.
# We see that though a word itself, in a "vacuum", may be potentially infinite in it's scope of meaning and possible use, when we use a word in the real world we see it to be limited by the fraught nature of reality. Words hence becoming like pi - incalculably long but practically useable in an abbreviated form, indeed, one can only use both irrational numbers and words in an abbreviated manner. Words in the world are subject to the laws of physics and by humanity's limited knowledge therefore although the wcf might facilitate a seemingly limitless capability of words which a user can exploit, in truth, the words have their own kind of agency once released.
Practical Application
a) For responsible foreign policy. When a war is fought on the basis of fighting terror in the name of freedom a leader is letting rip with an idea that takes the logical form of a spitting cobra. The war is not immoral, illegal or dangerous. It is rationally stupid from the onset, as would be fighting a war to destroy WMB because, again, this thing that they seek harbours its existence primarily within a title and not by real life objects.
b) For reasons of race relations. One may choose to call a person by any name one wishes but must take into consideration what the label implicates about your own beliefs and cultural awareness as well as what the use of the word could feasibly instigate in the mind and the mental health of the subject because once uttered and made public a word cannot be recaptured easily.
c) For the cause of the non-labelling of human beings. As terming a person a pensioner involves allowing the possibility of the entire global consciousness of everyone, even dogs, to flow into your conversation, as it does every time you use a word, (though this process will be checked) by doing so you grant interpretation of the essence of an entire human being. If they are a pensioner, as apposed to a person who is receiving a pension, when being communicated to or on behalf of, the personal worth of their life or their cause will be polluted by unnecessary linguistic ornamentation
d) In defence of religious language. Although lamb or sacrament in religious context possibly mean nothing, the variety of possible meanings leave the religious ones intact, if elusive.
Should stay in this evening and read 'Only Six Numbers' - it's going to be by a mathematician, and yo, in light of what the Harvard sausage was saying a week or two ago, by a man at that. Last night after watching Shawn of the Dead I drew a map of the universe, Medieval style with the Earth at the centre with "Label" in orbit on the right hand side of the planet and "Obey" to the left. I was trying to establish, in my own mind, how the principles of science, which exorcises legitimate "labelling", (of particles and processes) should be or should not be allowed into various functional aspects of our lives, such as as consumers - through formula distribution of clothing - entertainment, wages and services.
I am sure that humans are indirectly proportionate to atoms.
After re-publishing my language theory in my blog I have seen to revise it. What larks. I've put it into an equation to help me focus. All of my equations will hitherto remain secret so don't ask.
There was a second "phase" missing from my basic premise, which was "every time you use a word it has a different meaning."
The second phase, coming fractionally later in time to what I have temporarily dubbed the "word cause equation", is the event phase during which the word is used, read or heard in the real world outside of a place which must be like Platos World of the Forms: the user's "action" joined with the actuality of the word which is metaphysical until used. Any non-linguistic communication is part of this second phase, or the event phase.
Therefore using a word equates to: the wce + LIFE/nature/God. LIFE/nature/God consists entirely of nihilism, goodness (matter), light (here representing the metaphysical. Eg. love and metaphor), and Energy.
As life is fundamentally uncontrollable, so too then are words in action. However, the nature of languages encompasses finite aspects as well as time. One of these aspects is knowledge and another would be the proximal range of concepts or items to which a word might be adhered. Time, although unknowable and so, as thus, cannot be of mathematically infinite dimensions, is relevant to language because time provides a frame of semantics that is coupled with spatial location. This means that I need another formula, so I'll share mine with you though I'd previously...
tx (Infinity x u + U) x (W) = Infinity
In conclusion
# There are two phases of a words life each time that it is used.
# We see that though a word itself, in a "vacuum", may be potentially infinite in it's scope of meaning and possible use, when we use a word in the real world we see it to be limited by the fraught nature of reality. Words hence becoming like pi - incalculably long but practically useable in an abbreviated form, indeed, one can only use both irrational numbers and words in an abbreviated manner. Words in the world are subject to the laws of physics and by humanity's limited knowledge therefore although the wcf might facilitate a seemingly limitless capability of words which a user can exploit, in truth, the words have their own kind of agency once released.
Practical Application
a) For responsible foreign policy. When a war is fought on the basis of fighting terror in the name of freedom a leader is letting rip with an idea that takes the logical form of a spitting cobra. The war is not immoral, illegal or dangerous. It is rationally stupid from the onset, as would be fighting a war to destroy WMB because, again, this thing that they seek harbours its existence primarily within a title and not by real life objects.
b) For reasons of race relations. One may choose to call a person by any name one wishes but must take into consideration what the label implicates about your own beliefs and cultural awareness as well as what the use of the word could feasibly instigate in the mind and the mental health of the subject because once uttered and made public a word cannot be recaptured easily.
c) For the cause of the non-labelling of human beings. As terming a person a pensioner involves allowing the possibility of the entire global consciousness of everyone, even dogs, to flow into your conversation, as it does every time you use a word, (though this process will be checked) by doing so you grant interpretation of the essence of an entire human being. If they are a pensioner, as apposed to a person who is receiving a pension, when being communicated to or on behalf of, the personal worth of their life or their cause will be polluted by unnecessary linguistic ornamentation
d) In defence of religious language. Although lamb or sacrament in religious context possibly mean nothing, the variety of possible meanings leave the religious ones intact, if elusive.