some people might get bent outa shape over this.. but... its gotta be said... after all.. i pay for this shit.. i can say what i please. plus... everyone doesnt have to be so damned chipper and positive ALL the time! its not very becoming of a balanced blog to hold back your opinions. hah!
MOST (not all) of the new girls and sets that keep getting added to SG are kinda disappointing.
not that all these traits are bad... but..
stickly, unimpressive, boyish looking girls, no curves, flat asses, bad hair, and watered down (and/or no) sense of a subculture style or opinion.
if they didnt have tattoos, piercings, or weird hair... youd not give them a second look on the street. its harsh.. but its true and ya know it.
what i dont understand is... if this site is getting bombarded with hopeful would-be SG girls... cant the selection process have a little more range? do all the girls have to basically look the same?
if not for new sets by a couple girls on this site, (linz and nadine and the occasional new cutie) i'd stop giving my 15$ every 3 months. if nothing else.. this rant is what im paying for.
anyway... this bitch session is a long time in the making. once a former SG girl, named Hel, was taken off the site for speaking her mind in the message boards... since then, i havent had that much love for this site while simultaneously developing a little hesitation to voice any bold opinions here. anyway.. Hel was why i came back once my original membership ran out. if you havent seen Hel before... her old pic sets are still archived...here ya go:
http://suicidegirls.com/girls/Hel/
definatly the smokinest chick around.
here is where i'll prolly piss someone off...
i really dont like when missy photographs the girls. her lack of set concepts, uncreative photo shots, and same boring poses drain my will to live. as soon as ya open the gallery of thumbnails for that girls set... you can tell if missy took it. same shot after same boring shot. the girls dont even appear to be having a good time getting photographed. *remember before you consider railing on me... its just my opinion.*
now.. lithium picnic and a couple others... thats some good photography, and also partly why im still here.
id say that most the amateur photo sets.. like where the chicks boyfriend took the pics.. those seem to have the most appeal.
anyway... im having such a terrible week. if i wasnt... i wouldnt even bother bitching about this... as really... its stupid and doesnt help me feel any better.
in other news... the new tmobile sidekick II should be released any day now. and since ive had SO much trouble with sidekick I, my girlfriend got me hooked up with a free replacement/upgrade!! NOW that is a cool chick.. and she has a nice round booty.
MOST (not all) of the new girls and sets that keep getting added to SG are kinda disappointing.
not that all these traits are bad... but..
stickly, unimpressive, boyish looking girls, no curves, flat asses, bad hair, and watered down (and/or no) sense of a subculture style or opinion.
if they didnt have tattoos, piercings, or weird hair... youd not give them a second look on the street. its harsh.. but its true and ya know it.
what i dont understand is... if this site is getting bombarded with hopeful would-be SG girls... cant the selection process have a little more range? do all the girls have to basically look the same?
if not for new sets by a couple girls on this site, (linz and nadine and the occasional new cutie) i'd stop giving my 15$ every 3 months. if nothing else.. this rant is what im paying for.
anyway... this bitch session is a long time in the making. once a former SG girl, named Hel, was taken off the site for speaking her mind in the message boards... since then, i havent had that much love for this site while simultaneously developing a little hesitation to voice any bold opinions here. anyway.. Hel was why i came back once my original membership ran out. if you havent seen Hel before... her old pic sets are still archived...here ya go:
http://suicidegirls.com/girls/Hel/
definatly the smokinest chick around.
here is where i'll prolly piss someone off...
i really dont like when missy photographs the girls. her lack of set concepts, uncreative photo shots, and same boring poses drain my will to live. as soon as ya open the gallery of thumbnails for that girls set... you can tell if missy took it. same shot after same boring shot. the girls dont even appear to be having a good time getting photographed. *remember before you consider railing on me... its just my opinion.*
now.. lithium picnic and a couple others... thats some good photography, and also partly why im still here.
id say that most the amateur photo sets.. like where the chicks boyfriend took the pics.. those seem to have the most appeal.
anyway... im having such a terrible week. if i wasnt... i wouldnt even bother bitching about this... as really... its stupid and doesnt help me feel any better.
in other news... the new tmobile sidekick II should be released any day now. and since ive had SO much trouble with sidekick I, my girlfriend got me hooked up with a free replacement/upgrade!! NOW that is a cool chick.. and she has a nice round booty.
VIEW 10 of 10 COMMENTS
I'm not all that thrilled with my own set, but it was taken by an amatuer
</gia>
i really dig the amatuer photo sets. im not refering to your set in any of my bitching,
<gia>
I agree that my set lacks some serious creativity but that I can't blame on Missy.
</gia>
yeah man, you would have no reason to blame her. she didnt photograph your set. my only complant with missy was that her photo sets are boring due to the fact they are all look the same. same poses, positions, lots of like... standing up.. 8 front shots, turn alittle, 6 more shots, turn other way 6 more shots... samecamera angles over and over, a few where the girl is slightly leaning over, and a couple close ups. just see it for yourself. its not like i hate her or anything. haha. just an observation of a formula thats becoming noticable.
<gia>
I think it's the girls that make the site, and quite frankly if the girls don't have the high standards that we should, then yeah the site is going to lack.
</gia>
yes the girls make the site. if the girl submits a shitty set.. it shouldnt be used. but im not complaing about that. im saying.. there are an abundance of entry sets from girls coming into the site from all over the world. thus giving a wide selection to the persons picking who are to be SG. which was my point.. why are the majority of the girls looking the same.
<gia>
It can't all be up to the photographer to make the shoots happen.
</gia>
hmmm... i think they have a lot of the responsiblity.
and yeah... good point with the double standard. where is the logic to that? i dont think there is any. haha