Friday Apr 01, 2011

0
Oh my god a longish blog, could it be.

I have a scientific thought, which I thought of while watching The Big Bang theory. So you know it's legit.

Sheldon said something like "As much as i believe in the theory of multiple universes, and it is plausible that in one universe there is a sheldon that likes to dance", I'm paraphrasing, but that was the general idea.

Now sheldon is a physics theorist, who, as he states many time, does not believe in God even though he came from a religious home.

Now lets take away from sheldon and look at atheists and scientists, who in general believe there is no God. Now, I love science, i support the theory of evolution, there is alot of evidence to it, but I also believe there is something out there, whether it is a God or something else. I believe this because I feel I need to, and to keep myself right.

Anyway, The concept of multiple universes is that we don't know they exist, because obviously they are too far away, so the whole idea is there could be some, with other life, but there is no way of knowing. Thus, i conclude that Atheists are just as wrong for saying that there is no God because there is no firm evidence of this, as Scientists are for saying there are multiple universes, when, I would assume there is not alot of strong evidence for this.

I am sure I am totally wrong in this, and there will be some smart-arse who wont be able to resist telling me other wise, I just think it is a very interesting concept.


Moving on,
Tonight I am going to the pub with my dad, and we are going to talk about me moving out, which should be interesting.

I'd love your thoughts on all of the above.
Much love
x
skyerocket:
Not that I think I'm a smart arse, (biggrin) but surely the thing that makes scientists the winners is the fact that they hypothesise and investigate and attempt to come to a conclusion with some kind of factual base. They update their hypotheses where as religions tend to believe what they have believed for however many years and don't investigate it or question it, or accept developments and adjust their beliefs accordingly, as a scientist would.
So if it's a case of right and wrong, then no, no one is necessarily right but scientists have the upper hand for questioning everything and changing their "script" accordingly.

...I reckon... smile
guitarified:
Well i agree with you there, the point i was making was the lack of evidence of multiple universes is equal to the lack of evidence for religion, and there are people who do look for evidence for religion, however, as you say, on a whole christians etc do not.

More Blogs