I am going to school for video game design and I mean I may be just peeking my head around the huge corner of school I still like to pretend that I know my video games stuff.
So recently I was a part of a very heated argument over Call of Duty. I mean boxing ring status heated argument. In this corner we have the two young boys weighing in together at 120 lbs and have yet to hit puberty and with a every background in video games and playing on a regular basis and favors the World at War. In the other corner we have the very sexy Kellie who loves a good taco
and plays as an underground bad ass and favors the Black Ops. Of course, we were all playing World at War at the time. Kellie is complaining that the maps are NOTHING compared to the maps in Black Ops which is what started the argument. Of course me, who LOVES debates and then documenting them...did you notice this yet, may or may not have probed some more words being tranfered between the two parties.
I wanted to know why both parties favored thier games over the other. I mean of course to each his own but everyone has a reason for one way or another that they are going to stand up for something. Kellie again stated that the graphics and the maps were better in Black Ops. The "boys" stated that the maps and the game play were much better in World at War.
So because either party did not elaborate to an extent for their reasons of favoring. I want to know your opinions. Please extend your utmost brain cells towards me and share your wisdom. Which do you prefer? World at War or Black Ops and why?
xoxo [/IMG]
So recently I was a part of a very heated argument over Call of Duty. I mean boxing ring status heated argument. In this corner we have the two young boys weighing in together at 120 lbs and have yet to hit puberty and with a every background in video games and playing on a regular basis and favors the World at War. In the other corner we have the very sexy Kellie who loves a good taco
and plays as an underground bad ass and favors the Black Ops. Of course, we were all playing World at War at the time. Kellie is complaining that the maps are NOTHING compared to the maps in Black Ops which is what started the argument. Of course me, who LOVES debates and then documenting them...did you notice this yet, may or may not have probed some more words being tranfered between the two parties.
I wanted to know why both parties favored thier games over the other. I mean of course to each his own but everyone has a reason for one way or another that they are going to stand up for something. Kellie again stated that the graphics and the maps were better in Black Ops. The "boys" stated that the maps and the game play were much better in World at War.
So because either party did not elaborate to an extent for their reasons of favoring. I want to know your opinions. Please extend your utmost brain cells towards me and share your wisdom. Which do you prefer? World at War or Black Ops and why?
xoxo [/IMG]
VIEW 3 of 3 COMMENTS
codemonkeym:
I hope you still have things under control. 
veganvindicator:
Sorry, I'm going to have to side with the boys on this one, Black Ops is horrible. Although, to be honest, I felt that the target audience for Black Ops was 12 year old boys, not sexy chicks who like a good taco