Below is an email I've sent to Missy regarding my feelings towards the site. I cannot blindly support anything that I truly do not believe in. I'd like to thank all of the wonderful comments members and other SG's have left me since my first set going live. I've always appreciated it!
Upon learning about the way Missy deals with SG's who are in disagreeance of how she is running the site, I will likely be black bagged. So if that is the case, I bid you farewell and if you have any comments about this, feel free to email me at petite_hands@yahoo.com.
Dear Missy (or to whom she has given the task of filtering her emails),
In these last several months, my opinion of what SG stands for and what it provides to the girls of the site has changed in a disappointing way. The first I ever saw of the site was five years ago and I distinctly remember being captivated by the idea and the women behind it. Upon moving to Portland just over 2 years ago, I applied to become an SG and was enthusiastically accepted.
I have to say that since my first set went live and now, I am not happy with the direction SG is headed. However, I am lucky enough to not fell enough attachment to the site to hold back how I feel.
Of the six sets I have shot, three have been rejected. I could write you and entire essay on how wrongly that word is used, on this site of all places (doesn't declined sound nicer?). All sets were shot by London, one of the sites most talented and popular photographers. Recently, due to the increase of new girls to the site, you've also requested "higher quality" sets. I understand your reasoning for this tactic but sadly, I do not believe that this is achieving your goal. By implementing this, you have begun to treat older SG's in a fashion that does not stand behind why you started this site in the first place.
You wanted to give strong, unique, and sexy women the opportunity to express themselves in a place with practically no boundaries. Along with this should come the obvious which is am important tool to keep any business running in a smooth fashion, respect. Respect for themselves and for the other women on the site. The least you could do is show us the same.
The information I have received from your model coordinators (they seem to change every month, I wonder why?) about why my sets were rejected are obviously untrue. What I can gather from the details are the white lies you've fed to them to then relay to us.
I was told by a believable source that the reasons you rejected one the sets is that you didn't like my short hair (yet we can't wear wigs) and my cut off jean shorts because it was all too "boyish". Maybe I AM a tomboy. And this IS the way I express myself. And in another set, you didn't like the lighting or the way it was shot. Perhaps you should be discussing this need for "higher quality" sets with your photographers, for this is something that most girls have no eye for. They cannot control what is happening behind the lens when they are modeling.
From someone who has worked for small businesses all her life, I hope that you do take my opinion into serious consideration for it is not that I am angry I will no longer be an SG, but because this is absolutely no way to running a business.
Yours Truly,
Corey
Upon learning about the way Missy deals with SG's who are in disagreeance of how she is running the site, I will likely be black bagged. So if that is the case, I bid you farewell and if you have any comments about this, feel free to email me at petite_hands@yahoo.com.
Dear Missy (or to whom she has given the task of filtering her emails),
In these last several months, my opinion of what SG stands for and what it provides to the girls of the site has changed in a disappointing way. The first I ever saw of the site was five years ago and I distinctly remember being captivated by the idea and the women behind it. Upon moving to Portland just over 2 years ago, I applied to become an SG and was enthusiastically accepted.
I have to say that since my first set went live and now, I am not happy with the direction SG is headed. However, I am lucky enough to not fell enough attachment to the site to hold back how I feel.
Of the six sets I have shot, three have been rejected. I could write you and entire essay on how wrongly that word is used, on this site of all places (doesn't declined sound nicer?). All sets were shot by London, one of the sites most talented and popular photographers. Recently, due to the increase of new girls to the site, you've also requested "higher quality" sets. I understand your reasoning for this tactic but sadly, I do not believe that this is achieving your goal. By implementing this, you have begun to treat older SG's in a fashion that does not stand behind why you started this site in the first place.
You wanted to give strong, unique, and sexy women the opportunity to express themselves in a place with practically no boundaries. Along with this should come the obvious which is am important tool to keep any business running in a smooth fashion, respect. Respect for themselves and for the other women on the site. The least you could do is show us the same.
The information I have received from your model coordinators (they seem to change every month, I wonder why?) about why my sets were rejected are obviously untrue. What I can gather from the details are the white lies you've fed to them to then relay to us.
I was told by a believable source that the reasons you rejected one the sets is that you didn't like my short hair (yet we can't wear wigs) and my cut off jean shorts because it was all too "boyish". Maybe I AM a tomboy. And this IS the way I express myself. And in another set, you didn't like the lighting or the way it was shot. Perhaps you should be discussing this need for "higher quality" sets with your photographers, for this is something that most girls have no eye for. They cannot control what is happening behind the lens when they are modeling.
From someone who has worked for small businesses all her life, I hope that you do take my opinion into serious consideration for it is not that I am angry I will no longer be an SG, but because this is absolutely no way to running a business.
Yours Truly,
Corey
VIEW 25 of 34 COMMENTS
alottanada:
You're beautiful. Please come back.
reml1978:
'if his is beauty'., sometimes it wears off, sometimes it don't. What is so good about it, is that it never lets you down, even if you'd want it to. I love the way you wrote about it. I could see a fainth shift, I found it to be magnificent.