I'm just angry right now.
"Well I think if you're going to accuse someone of something, you have to put the other person on trial too"
Guess who said that?
My father. Basically, and yeah I'm airing dirty laundry,
He claims despite the fact he knows my mum's view of sex and relationships (not mine) which is they are one and the same, because she never openly discussed it before they went to China, he was under no obligation to be faithful to her on a physical level. He then went on point that there was a possibility that mum had slept with other people (.000000000000000000000000000000005% and this is not because of any particular like or dislike of my mother only my understanding of her nature) and because he hadn't accused her of it, it didn't matter that what he had done probably hurt mum because there was a possibility she had done it too,and how I was a hypocrite for not putting mum on trial for the same thing, therefore he had done nothing wrong and I was in the wrong to bring it up unless I accused both of them of doing it.
He then claimed I was agreeing to her moral standard (once again not true), and that I was not taking his into account, which wasn't even the question I was asking him simply being once again DID He think that by sleeping around with people in China had he violated her trust ? That by not admitting that there was a possibility (which is false, I just think it's an awfully low one, as I said up there) that I was hypocrite since I was not treating his non-accusation, accusation the same way as his admission of basically mucking around behind her back....
Fuck this is my father, these are half by genetics. I am at least half-giant-fucking-bastard
"Well I think if you're going to accuse someone of something, you have to put the other person on trial too"
Guess who said that?
My father. Basically, and yeah I'm airing dirty laundry,
He claims despite the fact he knows my mum's view of sex and relationships (not mine) which is they are one and the same, because she never openly discussed it before they went to China, he was under no obligation to be faithful to her on a physical level. He then went on point that there was a possibility that mum had slept with other people (.000000000000000000000000000000005% and this is not because of any particular like or dislike of my mother only my understanding of her nature) and because he hadn't accused her of it, it didn't matter that what he had done probably hurt mum because there was a possibility she had done it too,and how I was a hypocrite for not putting mum on trial for the same thing, therefore he had done nothing wrong and I was in the wrong to bring it up unless I accused both of them of doing it.
He then claimed I was agreeing to her moral standard (once again not true), and that I was not taking his into account, which wasn't even the question I was asking him simply being once again DID He think that by sleeping around with people in China had he violated her trust ? That by not admitting that there was a possibility (which is false, I just think it's an awfully low one, as I said up there) that I was hypocrite since I was not treating his non-accusation, accusation the same way as his admission of basically mucking around behind her back....
Fuck this is my father, these are half by genetics. I am at least half-giant-fucking-bastard
VIEW 14 of 14 COMMENTS
---
It did drag on forever, didn't it? I am still unimpressed. But, you can now have it to cherish.. or until you pass it on.
---
So, what's news? Tricks?
Wanna go to the ACMI next week or something? Anyway, my membership ends in 3 days and I have to go anon as you can still read people's journals after they leave, I don't like that idea...
Take care and don't give up on me!!!
xxxx