So, I found this comment on the SG Myspace page today.
"I was waiting to see if I wanted to join SG.com...and I'm glad I did. In spite of having some fantastically attractive models, apparantly SG is little more than a touchstone for scene kids desperate to validate their "hipness, " and as an adult I have no desire--no, it would be an EMBARASSMENT--to associate myself with a site with such a juvenile membership. I will explore <insert other site here> in search of a more mature audience, where the models are every bit as lovely and the photography vastly superior."
This made me upset. The man is entitled to his opinion, obviously, but if he doesn't have a membership, how exactly can he make a judgement about the members of SG?
Juvenile is not a word I would ever use to describe the members on this site. He can go fuck himself. Argg!!!
"I was waiting to see if I wanted to join SG.com...and I'm glad I did. In spite of having some fantastically attractive models, apparantly SG is little more than a touchstone for scene kids desperate to validate their "hipness, " and as an adult I have no desire--no, it would be an EMBARASSMENT--to associate myself with a site with such a juvenile membership. I will explore <insert other site here> in search of a more mature audience, where the models are every bit as lovely and the photography vastly superior."
This made me upset. The man is entitled to his opinion, obviously, but if he doesn't have a membership, how exactly can he make a judgement about the members of SG?
Juvenile is not a word I would ever use to describe the members on this site. He can go fuck himself. Argg!!!
VIEW 6 of 6 COMMENTS
jersey:
thank you for commenting on my set.
northern:
He wasn't leaving a real comment - he was advertising the other site.