atrasties

well jebus; here we are; just you and me sitting in the dark; we had the same amount to drink and yet you ain't saying nothing. This leads me to believe you don't want folks to know you exsist. Well I'm ok with that; the thing I'm not ok with is you leading us down the garden path. This fellow Bush what seems so snuggly with you is saying some things which don't rightly ring true, hows bout some clarifying? Is this fellow saddam the devil?; seems them south park boys hit it clear the devil is the devil but saddam's got his own agenda. Them folk in Iraq, they's innocent right? Well for the most part; sure, but like any barrel of apples you get a few bad ones. Sure but what to do with the bad ones, well we can't just eradicate people because they don't follow the guidelines of the administration, or can we? This is the dilema, more people know about things quicker than ever before, so how do you target an enemy and still keep the bad things quiet? Well good media presentation of course, with your finger on enough pulses, the few that slip through are going to be thought of as subversive anyways. So..... How do we rely on the media? We don't. It is in the best interest of all to look at the larger picture, the months or years leading up to this point, the time before September 11 and see where this was going. Bin Laden just provided a target, a focus which somehow became Iraq, settled on the second biggest oil depository in the world. Is this a war for the right reasons or for the continued survival of the fittest? Which according to doctrine is the U.S.? Now I'm basing my supposition on information provided me by the world media, a few which include american reporters trying to get at the real story. So am I falling under the hypocracy of free speech or are you falling under the thumb of control in the whitehouse? Either way God save the innocent.