random question

3

Can someone explain the logic to me (because I can't see any) of a hopeful or SG posting a censored photo they posted on instagram onto this site? For that matter a "naked" photo that they cover everything with their hands or arms? Especially considering they already have nude photographs on this site? (I sort of get it for an average member) I mean...
Read More

VIEW 3 of 3 COMMENTS
tactical:

@superbabzy Oh good so it's not just me lol

hanke:

Thank you sweet!

something else I found funny

1

So the other day an acquaintance of mine, told me "I'm still waiting on the long con from you". I had to laugh at that, it was too funny, especially since the day before they said "I don't think there is anyone else like you, at least I hope not, cause we'd all be fucked". It was further explained that they did...
Read More

teslablackbone:

"You don't know the half of it" is an excellent answer lol!

tactical:

@TESLABLACKBONE Well I'm glad you enjoyed,  it seemed fitting

website features/comedy

2

One feature I find useful about this new layout. The little heart button on the pics/blogs/vids. It makes it easier to not really even read the full thing or think of anything to say. I think my new policy will be to just heart the post if it's from someone who doesn't really respond.

Got the chance recently to see Lewis...
Read More

arroia:

The little heart is super useful for pics only blogs. Oh, and another thing I love about the new site is the 'back to the top' button. I wish I had that for every single page online.

What you said about people fighting hardest for their homes and way of life is such simple truth, but many don't understand it. Make someone fight for ideals of other's and they'll waste a bullet or two. Make someone fight for their children, and they'll give their lives without thinking twice.

tactical:

@arroia that back to top button is nice| Most people never need to know or understand that which is good for them. 

random thought

2

I find it funny when someone posts a picture of their cat or a blog about their cat and it gets no comments. Now I can be a bit of a "dick" I suppose (So I've been told) but it honestly just makes me chuckle a little. It makes me think I'm not alone in not giving a shit about others pets. Now...
Read More

VIEW 12 of 12 COMMENTS
tactical:

@blur_ Well I don't hear that often lol

yates_doom:

It's not just that I don't give a shit. It's just not interesting. The end result is the same. No reaction.

thanksgiving

1

So I have been teaching BB (as well as some nieces and nephews) to shoot when I am able to(the location I am in now prevents it some). She is getting alright at it, she is still a little hesitant with my larger pistols (which sucks for her as iuse nearly exclusively .45 for my pistols), except for my favorite. She likes that one...
Read More

VIEW 7 of 7 COMMENTS
mneylu:

I will :)

tactical:

@quince_Well you're very welcome @mneylu I bet ;)

I found this conversation interesting

1

So people are perplexed by me at times. I got into a conversation the other day about how intelligence and and the view that violence is sometimes necessary seem strange to exist in the same person. To me it seems strange that they wouldn't exist together. An intelligent person should realize that violence is essential. To say it is not is to live in...
Read More

changed view

2

I read a news story recently (well fairly recently, a couple weeks ago now) that said that the mental development of people had slowed. That people are no longer finished with brain development until she 25. At the time I didn't really see it. Looking back however and a few exchanges with 20-25 year olds (especially recently) this view has changed. At least it...
Read More

VIEW 5 of 5 COMMENTS
tactical:

@arroia I think the article was speaking more of the psychological and physiological development of the brain not changes in views or opinions as those should change with new information. Who wouldn't be able to get along with you?  ;)| I've always at find the 1-5 stystem to be lacking precision, I usually don't go less than 1-10 but if it works for you I'm all for it

arroia:

Ah, that makes more sense. I almost said that they've invented hot water.

I doubt any of my danger or fun levels would be impressive if the scale was 1-10. Maybe my overeating levels, but that's about it. ;)

observation

1

Does it seem to anyone else that a lot of posts recently are just advertisements for the site or products in the store?

(I don't know why it put this in the quoted box)

Let's make that the question of the day.

things I find funny/strange

1

I truly enjoy when people describe and label themselves. It always makes me laugh. Especially when their actions contradict their descriptions and labels (as they nearly always do). People delusions and failure to accurately evaluate themselves is often the cause. Sometimes the delusions are due to stupidity, sometimes cowardice, sometimes vanity, sometimes it's a simple lack of testing hypotheses. I'm sure there are...
Read More

VIEW 10 of 10 COMMENTS
tactical:

@trills my normal rule is laugh it off unless it effects me in some way| sometimes when I'm feeling ornery and feel like bringing it up I usually boil it down to one simple question that shakes the foundation I call it a "logic bomb" or sometimes depending on the size of it a "logic nuke" lol| fundamentalists usually require a different tactic, I don't mind being disrespectful to people who are disrespectful. With true fundamentalists there is a set belief that they will not waiver from no matter how much logic they face. So my usual response it "if heaven is full of people like you I'm glad I'm not going" out is slightly disrespectful but they take it as a win because most don't like "if" so they often remove it lol| however in the case I was talking about it is the original lie that suits the tellers ego.

yates_doom:

To search for an answer to why people misrepresent themselves is a waste. Motive can never be discovered, only speculated. Maybe what appears as misrepresentation, is simply an opinion based on a larger sample size than what you have access to. Everything is a choice. I choose to ignore fakes. Maybe people you have pointed this flaw out to needed it from you.