The issue of age difference has been very apparent lately. I grew up fast and was always surrounded by people much older than me and I've always found it very difficult to relate to others my age. Needless to say, I've never found age to be a very important factor in any type of relationship. Lately, it's all I think about. Are age brackets really that important? Erik Erikson believed that being in a certain age bracket means that you are undergoing a specific psychosocial development. Is it really realistic to believe that everyone experiences everything at the same time?
Shaine,
I'm not entirely sure how to put together the 2nd and 3rd sentences in the quote above. If you've always found it very difficult to relate to others your own age, then it seems that you have found age to be an important factor in at least some types of relationship. I assume you mean that you've never found being in any kind of relationship with someone older than you to be an issue at all, but have found the reverse age difference to be a problem.
If so, you're not alone. Many, if not most, of my female friends feel the same way and have explicitly talked about this very issue--mostly in the case of romantic relationships. And, given the statistics on age differences in 2nd marriages (if I remember correctly, it's on average 10-15 years in the man's "favor", in heterosexual marriages), I think my personal survey via my friends applies more generally. There are many different "explanations" for this, ranging from evolutionary (back in the days of prehistory, older women were more likely to die during child birth, so genetic predisposition for males to be attracted to older women were passed on less frequently than a predisposition to be attracted to younger women) to Jungian psychology (anima / animus concepts) and everything in between. There's also a strong contingent of the "age ain't nothin' but a number" attitude, of course.
In any case, if age brackets ARE in fact important to YOU--if that is your experience--then it bears thinking on perhaps, but ultimately you are who you are! And if you relate better to people older than you, then, well, that's that. Growing up, I was really good friends with a group of boys about 4 years older than me, and so I listened to music and read books and watched movies and talked about stuff that was just a bit ahead of "my generation". As mentioned by another poster, that sort of thing provides a body of shared cultural reference and attitudes and characters and stories and all that. So that could be a factor. But for me, it didn't mean that I favored older friends. It just meant that later in life I could relate well to both older and younger people.
I think there is good evidence that there ARE psychological stages of development and important milestones along this path, and I think there is also good evidence that there is SOME correlation with physical age. However . . . it's only a statistical, general thing. Any individual person can obviously be at one or the other side of the bell curve. And it's not a linear thing--sometimes we progress out of order, or have to revisit something we thought we were done with. And in any case, I suspect it's a pretty broad curve.
All of that said, it is my considered opinion and personal experience that girls and women are generally more mature for their age than boys and men. This is more significant for younger age groups I think, but still not insignificant even into middle age. For me, this is part of why I have an easier time relating to younger women than to younger men (younger than me, that is). I was involved in one of the University environmental groups recently (well, I still am) and I found the few undergraduate men who were in the group to be markedly immature and lacking in common sense in certain areas while I pretty much related to the women as equals. The male grad student who started the group I related to just fine, as an equal, but he was at least 5 years older than the three undergrads. Just anecdotal, to be sure, and far from proving anything, but it does illustrate my opinion, whatever the merits of said opinion.
FWIW.
-Jim
My personal experience ranges widely in terms of age difference, in both directions. For my own part I would offer that trust and truthfulness have been far and away the most vitally important factors in my relationships and their overall satisfaction than anything else. Age, ethnicity, religion, social, educational and cultural differences have all been small considerations compared to that. If I trust someone I respect and appreciate them with ease and without hesitation. In that absence of trust there is little to celebrate.
Make any sense?