If numbers are only criteria rather than those they claim (i.e., good set plus activity on site and quality of comments [e.g. "nice tits" doesn't hold as much weight as "This set is the first one I came across when I joined SG. I found it because Scotty is so active on the site, she cannot be missed. Obviously she is gorgeous with a great body . . . of work (double entendre intended), but more importantly she pulls punters like myself in and keeps us intrigued. These...]) then you are right mathematically and need to selll your set elsewhere:
89/100=696/800; 97/100=970/1000; 970-696=274. So even if you got 200 more + comments, you would fall way short of 97%.
However, the reason I have been improving quality of my comments is because they say that they take these into account along with activity on site. I think your % #s are screwed because you have a couple of haters. I would think the review board would also take into account a couple of jealous, venomous bitches (as they have access to that.
This dissertation is meant to give you hope by pointing out that one can't go by numbers alone in this game.
Yaayyy! I love those backstage peepers from your sexy set! They make me laugh! I know what ya mean about the hard nipple thang...I do the same! You are toooooooo cute, mama!
I kiss girls too...I would LOVE to kiss u. Your eyes are such a gleaming emerald green, so gorgeous!
Thanku for your lovin on my newest set, pretty lady! You are such a gem. I adore the fuck outta u!