0
here, i'll itemize for you my waning interest in suicidegirls.

i chalk it up to my disgust at:

* the overall low standard of photography. that's what happens when you don't pay all of the photographers. i understand this is part of what makes an amateur porn site work, the acknowledgement that not everyone is a fancy-pants million-dollar picture-taker, but seriously, 800+ girls is a...
Read More
_mu_:
i think you're right... but... yes i think ther is a "but"...

first of all you must excuse my terrible english... but the urgence of expression, you know...

i think that one should not *charge* this site with too many expectetions... i mean, for a brief moment i thought that this place could be the best place where to find the best people in the world... but i don't think so, no more.

i.e. when you decide to open your site to pubblicity [in a so massive way!], to a specific [sordid] target that think that stars' tattoes are still original... there's not so much to hope from!

you if loose contact with reality, if you start to become just bigger and bigger... [just like the Sg site] then you are no more a model for none, that is at least intelligent...

anyway... i think that something good remain... sometime is funny, and here you can always find a different type of beauty... and that's good...

and you can always try to improve my english
:-]

rogerrabbit:
Came by to say that I recently saw Marigold and was impressed with your participation in "Cleo Eats It". So nice job.
Errr, the rest of it, well there is a fair amount of crap on sets, but the gems are gems and the depth of creative expression dedicated to many sets (for what is really and inconsequential amount of time in the highlight) is really impressive. As far as using feminism as a deceptive marketting magnet, well we're all chumps in one way or another; oh yes we are.